Beefcake! Sexy Advertising Studs of the 70s, Part 2

So John Oates did a little modeling on the side....who knew?

You are "an animal" according to the ad copy. But those hideous stripes make me think of a zebra, not a tiger, sport.

What body suit? I'm too distracted by the serious looking 'stache.

Holy smokes. The caption for this one needs to be, "One of These Things Does Not Go With the Others" - case in point that bald bearded man at the top. Where'd they pick up that dude - Pedophiles Anonymous?

This gem comes courtesy of Retrospace. I just have two questions: 1. why do the hear muffs have to be so freakin' huge and 2. how did such a goofy looking guy get a hot chick? I know I'd dropkick both from my boudoir.

Two examples of patterned underwear...never looks good, even when being modeled by a long-haired Robert Redford lookalike.


This was a "pretty good idea"???

Things happen when you wear Eleganza, alright. Like people pointing and laughing at you.

Oh damn you! If I could have found those, I would have used them!!
ReplyDeleteAmazing how lots of guys looked like Jim Croce back then.
Feel free to repurpose them, Barbara!
ReplyDeleteHoly Smokes Pam. I was not ready for that sock ad. At least they are wearing them on their feet and not somewhere else. Gulp.
ReplyDeleteYikes - good one, Mimi!
ReplyDeleteThose are hysterical. I still cannot stand pornstaches.
ReplyDeleteMarie @ Lemondrop ViNtAge
Spring into Spring giveaway
Hear muffs? Are you kidding me? I love the one with all the naked guys in socks. Oh geez. I'm so tickled. Thanks, I needed a laugh today.
ReplyDelete